In some instances I know that smokers are charged higher medicare premiums. This was established because the medical needs of smokers are considered to be very high, and expensive for a publicly funded insurance.
I was wondering today if senior who chose no to be vaccinated against COVID may also have very expensive health needs. What is the logic for charging smokers higher premiums, but not charging non-vaccers? I'm not giving an opinion, but it might be interesting to debate. I try not to judge others. Should there be a penalty for one, and not the other. One has an addiction, and can't easily stop smoking. One just doesn't want to receive a vaccine against a highly contagious, and deadly virus. Where does stigma fit in?